In Case You Know Freud And Winnicott

April 1st, 2009

It gives me shivers:

For Freud, in short, man was the ambivalent animal; for Winnicott, he would be the dependent animal… Prior to sexuality as the unacceptable, there was helplessness.  Dependence was the first thing, before good and evil.

Adam Phillips


This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 1st, 2009 at 8:10 pm and is filed under Psychology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Comments

  1. Puck says:

    I don’t get it.

Leave a Reply